ON MANDATORY VACCINES FOR VETERANS — SEND YOUR REPS AN EMAIL IN SECONDS

IMAGE SOURCE: activistpost.com

Want to tell your representatives how you REALLY feel? This issue on SB1203 has been taken up by Major General Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army Retired). You can automatically send an email to your representatives and it will take you seconds. We don’t have much time to stop this from being approved in Congress. It has already been approved by the Senate.

Read more:

From General Bert:

Help me stop the Veterans Vaccine Mandate from passing the House of Representatives! Flood the House with your emails demanding that this horrible idea go no further.

On November 10, 2015 — the day before Veterans Day, the US Senate passed S. 1203 giving the VA the responsibility of mandating vaccines for all veterans. If they exercise their legally protected Right to Informed Consent, they can be denied all medical care.

The bill deceptively says that veterans “can” receive any vaccine on the CDC’s Adult Vaccine Schedule and then goes on to direct the VA to create and implement the mandated vaccination of all veterans with all vaccines on the schedule.

What about freedom? What about Informed Consent? What about rights? What about scientific, medical, religious or philosophical reasons to refuse vaccinations? Gone, all gone.

This bill is another wedge splintering our freedoms.

Frankly, the Natural Solutions Foundation has been telling people for more than a decade that Adult Vaccination was coming.

It’s here.

Veterans need the same protection that Health Care Workers, Child Care Workers, Grandparents and the rest of us do: Vaccine Mandates are illegal, dangerous and tyrannical.

After taking action to pound on the House of Representatives, please let everyone you know who is a veteran, knows a veteran or loves personal freedom about this campaign before it is too late to stop this horrifyingly dangerous law.

And get your Advance Vaccine Directive exemption card here: http://www.DrRimaTruthReports.com/AdvanceVaccineDirective

Yours in health and freedom,

General Bert

_______________________________________________

Just go to the following link to sign; once you plug in your address, this will generate your representatives contact info and will automatically send off the text of the email below to their inboxes. QUICK AND EASY!

CLICK HERE: http://org.salsalabs.com/o/568/p/dia/action3/common/public/?action_KEY=18737#Act

_______________________________________________

THE TEXT OF GENERAL BERT’S EMAIL:

November 11, 2015

Open Letter to Senator Dean Heller (R-NV)

Senator,

Your recent legislation, S.1203 is a disgrace to the Congress of the United States and a life-threatening affront and threat to the Veterans of the United States and Minor Possessions.

Sec. 101 of your misnamed “21st Century Veterans Benefits Delivery Act”, tasks the Department of Veterans Affairs with the mandate to “ensure that veterans receiving medical services under chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, receive each immunization on the recommended adult immunization schedule at the time such immunization is indicated on that schedule.”

There are more than 90 vaccines so scheduled or listed in the Adult Immunization Schedule of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a nested pair of astonishingly corrupt organizations whose vaccine recommendations are flawed by such deep conflicts of interest as that of Dr. Paul Offit who sat on a panel voting to recommend the vaccine of he, himself, shares ownership of the patent. Rather than recuse himself, he enthusiastically voted to approve an unnecessary vaccine which causes pneumonia, potentially lethal death of the GI tract of infants and meningitis, but which garnered him a minimum of $148,000,000 in the first year of its approval.

Similar dealings pervade the “approval” of every vaccine.

Vaccines have been held by the US Supreme Court to be “unavoidably unsafe” and by the insurance underwriting industry to be “an uninsurable risk”, matched only in its uninsurable riskiness by the nuclear generation industry, which is also uninsurable.

You have introduced legislation which exposes ALL veterans to an escalating cascade of “unavoidably unsafe” vaccines in order to assure that they maintain the access to medical treatment which they require and have been promised solemnly by the government for whom they were willing to put themselves in harm’s way and which they have trusted.

You, Sir, have made a mockery of that trust and service. You would deny medical treatment to veterans who seek only to exercise their right to Informed Consent regarding vaccines. You do this knowing that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.”

Your colleagues who voted YEA for this atrocious bill can be excused, perhaps, on the basis that they were not performing the duty they have taken an oath to execute faithfully by, as is so common, not reading, and even more common, not understanding the legislation which they voted for.

You, Sir, have no such excuse because your office singlehandedly introduced legislation which would destroy the immune capacity of ex-servicemen and -women who will not be able to tolerate the genetically modified DNA, the mercury, the aluminum, the Polysorbate 80, the cancer cell line and aborted fetal cell line DNA, the formaldehyde and other toxic ingredients, to say nothing of the still-infective viruses included in so many of the vaccines.

The fact that these vaccines are, according to the FDA, ALL experimental but that some are both experimental in untested seems to have escaped you, Sir.

Or perhaps not.

You and your spouse are positioned in at least 35 municipal bond projects and the like, principally in California. Is it possible, Sir, that with your degree in finance, you are concerned that these municipal ventures and holdings will be less valuable, pay smaller dividends, if they are faced with expenses related to housing for veterans and other services to them? Is it possible that you wish to cut the cost of the medical services provided by the Veterans Administration and Social Security payments to them by making sure that they are dead much sooner than otherwise, absent the deluge of uninsurable, “unavoidably unsafe” toxic injections you have mandated for them?

Is it possible that you understand clearly that while the proximate profits of vaccinating some 22 million veterans with multiple doses of some 90+ (and more coming) vaccinations would be vast, the downstream profits from the chronic degenerative diseases linked with vaccines, from cancer to diabetes to Alzheimer’s Disease and so much more, are unthinkably huge?

Is it also possible that the men and women who have served the United Stated, although anticipated to decline from today’s approximately 22 million to about 14 million in 2043 according to the National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics is not declining fast enough to reduce the “burden” on the public coffers for you?

Or is it possible that the real agenda is that these men and women have taken an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic and you share the distrust and fear of these men and women as potential terrorists because they value the Constitution AND know how to shoot?

I am a retired United States Army Major General and a West Point Graduate as was my father before me.

I fought in the wars, both cold and hot, of the United States and was promised health care for the rest of my life in return.

I understand, as you apparently do not, Sir, that it is illegal in the United States to require the surrender of a benefit, in this case, Medical Care under the Veterans Administration, in order to assert a right, in this case, the right of Informed Consent.

I understand, as you apparently do not, Sir, that my right to Informed Consent, to refuse whatever medical intervention is offered without pressure, prejudice or punishment, is secured by Case Law (see, for example, Missouri v. McNeely, 2013) and statute in the United States. I do not give my informed consent for any vaccination.

I understand, as apparently you do not, Sir, that there is no legislation which the United States can pass to remove my personal right of Informed Consent because it is additionally guaranteed by the Geneva Conventions, which the United States signed and ratified. I also understand, as apparently you have overlooked, that, according to the Constitution of the United States, treaty law supersedes National, State or local laws.

Therefore, Sir, you law forcing me to give up my right to medical services through the Veterans Administration is unlawful.

You, Sir, are participating in the violation of the US Constitution, case and statute law AND aiding and abetting a Crime Against Humanity by seeking to remove a right which cannot be removed lawfully from me or my fellow-veterans and by seeking to enlist others in the commission of similar crimes.

Your lawlessness is unconscionable. Your willingness to use the unlawful powers of the State and its agencies to remove my sovereignty over my own body is despicable.

Whatever you motivation, and that of your 10 co-sponsors might be, it is both ignoble and unworthy of a person elected to represent and serve the people of the United States.

You, Sir, are subject to recall if 25% of the voters who participated in the last election in Nevada wish it. They would be wise to do so.

It is my profound hope that the good people of Nevada see fit to so remove you.

In the meantime, I shall be doing my best to enlist all of my fellow veterans in a campaign to assert their protected Right of Informed Consent and to refuse the intrusive and totally unacceptable threat to their life, their liberty and their rights.

Yours in health and freedom,

Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III
(US Army, Ret.)
President
Natural Solutions Foundation

DON’T WAIT!

Do this today and encourage other veterans to do the same.

Original post: CLICK HERE

US Senate Passes Bill Approving Mandatory Vaccinations for Veterans

Column: Politics

Region: USA in the World
By Janet Phelan

Fundamentally, biological warfare is sneaky. It involves a microbial sucker punch to its intended target, often accomplished in a manner in which the aggressor can claim clean hands, while his victim may suffer or die.

Biological warfare can take a number of forms. The question—how can you get a bacteriological or toxic agent on board without the target being alerted– has been asked and answered. In addition to using humans and animals as vectors, biological warfare agents can be airborne, waterborne, foodborne or put into pharmaceuticals.

Substantial concerns have been voiced concerning the potential for inserting bioweapons into vaccines. Indeed, given the history of known contaminated vaccines, this is hardly a matter of speculation. Polio vaccines have been found to contain cancer. A Merck rotavirus vaccine was found to be contaminated with a pig virus. Another Merck product, the Hepatitis B vaccine, was reported to have been laced with the AIDS virus., In addition, a tetanus vaccine distributed in the third world was found to contain human chorionic gonadotrophin, an anti-fertility agent known to produce spontaneous abortions.

The correlation between the rise in vaccinations of children and autism has become an urban legend.

A Bill has just passed the US Senate, mandating that the US Department of Veteran Affairs ensure that all veterans receive immunizations (vaccines) per a draconian schedule. At this juncture, active military must receive over a dozen vaccines. This piece of legislation is therefore an effort to extend the vaccine mandate to those who have previously served their country.

Sec. 101 of Senate Bill 1203, named the 21st Century Veterans Benefits Delivery Act, states that the Department of Veterans Affairs will be tasked with the mandate to “ensure that veterans receiving medical services under chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, receive each immunization on the recommended adult immunization schedule at the time such immunization is indicated on that schedule.”

The schedule referred to above is frankly staggering. Over ninety vaccines are listed.

The issues here are legion. First of all, an entire group of individuals, those who at one time were in military service, will lose their inherent right to opt out of receiving what is considered prophylactic treatment. According to Anita Stewart, who served in the Air Force and now hosts Wise Women Media radio show, “This could include experimental vaccines or vaccines that have not been tested.”

It is believed that those who refuse will, under this Bill, lose their medical benefits.

Second, there is the issue of the sheer numbers of allegedly preventative immunizations required on this schedule. As anyone who has come down with a case of the flu due to taking a flu shot might realize, the numbers of immunizations on the required schedule could be enough to sicken anyone.

And herein lurks the question of vaccine safety. Flu vaccines have been known to cause Guillain- Barre syndrome, which is a neurological disorder wherein a person’s own immune system attacks the nerve cells and can cause paralysis. Gulf War Syndrome, which may manifest with such symptoms as rash, severe fatigue, muscle and joint pain, headache, irritability, depression, gastrointestinal and respiratory disorders and neurological cognitive defects, is thought by some researchers to have been caused by “vaccine overload.” According to Dr. Mae-Wan Ho and Professor Malcolm Hooper, US Gulf war soldiers received “at least 17 different vaccines, including live vaccines (polio and yellow fever as well as experimental vaccines that had not been approved (anthrax, botulinum toxoid) and were of doubtful efficacy.”

Other researchers have attributed Gulf War Syndrome specifically to the anthrax vaccine given the troops.

In addition, a certain cluster of vaccines have been linked to type one diabetes.  The H1N1 vaccine has been linked to miscarriages and stillbirths. According to this report, the H1N1 shot resulted in sixty times the rate of miscarriage associated with the seasonal flu vaccine.

H1N1 was also found to be linked to a spike in narcolepsy in children. According to this study, there was a four hundred percent increase in the incidence of narcolepsy in those under 20 years of age who received the swine flu vaccine.

It would literally be possible to go on for pages here. The pattern is clear. Vaccine safety is a realistic concern.

In light of the considerable scientific evidence that vaccines cause illness, one must ask what this piece of legislation hopes to attain. Writes Anita Stewart, “Forced mandates are nothing more than medical tyranny….Vaccines in most cases do not cure or protect us, but could make some of us sicker and definitely create a huge and continuing revenue stream for Big Pharma.”

There are no studies concerning the effects of these numbers of vaccines on adults. Equally, there are no studies concerning the “polypharmacy” effects of combining these vaccines. Given the increasing scrutiny of civil rights abuses in the US, coupled with escalating concerns about what appears to be covert US biological weapons activity in a number of different venues, one might expect that Senate Bill 1203 will result in an upsurge of protest.

Veterans have already served their country. To re-enlist them as lab rats diminishes both the concepts of freedom and democracy and also those who have served to protect these ideals.

Senate Bill 1203 was authored by US Senator Dean Heller, Republican from Nevada. It passed the US Senate on November 10, 2015 and now goes to the House of Representatives for consideration.

Janet C. Phelan, investigative journalist and human rights defender that has traveled pretty extensively over the Asian region, an author of a tell-all book EXILE, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

First appeared: http://journal-neo.org/2015/11/15/us-senate-passes-bill-approving-mandatory-vaccinations-for-veterans/

Support Strengthens to Stop Oil and Gas Development to Keep Florida’s Everglades Wild

By Julie Dermansky • Sunday, November 15, 2015 - 14:49

Betty Osceola, a member of the Miccosukee tribe and Panther clan, has made it her mission to protect the Everglades. The 49-year-old grandmother, who operates an airboat tour company in the Everglades, plans to spend the rest of her life protecting the land of her ancestors for future generations. 

Despite millions of dollars spent on conservation in recent years, the Everglades is still threatened by factors including, pollution, invasive species, salt water intrusion, and the ongoing development of South Florida that continues to encroach on indigenous lands.

Yet of all the threats, Osceola sees a proposed bike path that would cut through the Everglades as the most important threat to stop – and she is not alone. 

Osceola is part of a growing coalition of Indian tribes, environmental groups, and concerned citizens who are fighting the creation of The River of Grass Greenway (ROGG), a bike path that would connect Naples to Miami. Stopping the bike path is a move to keep what is still wild in the Everglades, wild.

Betty Osceola on an airboat in the Everglades. © 2015 Julie Dermansky

Alligator in the Everglades. © 2015 Julie Dermansky

The ROGG was designed to be built along U.S. Route 41, one of two roads that cross through the Everglades. The path, if created, would be a multi-purpose 76-mile-long, 12 to 16 foot wide road that would include restroom facilities and additional loop paths that cut into the Everglades. 

Construction of the new path would cut through seven national and state parks, two native reservations, and a World Heritage Site.

Swamp along Turner River in the Big Cypress National Preserve. © 2015 Julie Dermansky 

Deer on the side of U.S. Route 41. © 2015 Julie Dermansky 

The coalition’s objections against the project include further destruction of the wetlands, disruption of vital watersheds, fragmentation of critical habitat for endangered species, the further commercialization of the Everglades, encroachment on indigenous land, and desecration of burial grounds.

Python captured in the Everglades, at the Skunk Ape Nature Reserve & Research Center in Ochopee on U.S. Route 41. © 2015 Julie Dermansky 

Some also fear that the pathway could potentially open the floodgate to new oil drilling and fracking because the design plans leave open the possibility of incorporating other elements that could include power lines or even pipelines.

Pipeline in the Everglades. © 2015 Julie Dermansky

“The bike path is an example of greenwashing at its worst,” Osceola told DeSmog during an airboat tour in the wetlands. “It is being sold as a project to promote stewardship, help conservation, and help Everglades restoration,” but she and others against the project believe it will do the opposite. 

“There is no need for anything new,” Osceola said. “Cutting trees to build a road isn’t green. The greenest thing would be to use the bike paths we have already,” she said.

VIDEO: Betty Osceola on Environmental Issues Facing the Everglades

The Miccosukee tribe issued an official comment letter against the ROGG draft plan that includes a list of federal acts it alleges it breaks, including skipping initial tribal consultation before commissioning the feasibility study.

There are now over 400 miles of paved and unpaved trails for hiking and biking already throughout the Everglades, according to a Sierra Club Calusa Group ROGG letter opposing the project signed by dozens of concerned citizens and local business owners located along the route of the proposed bike path.

“Since writing the letter, after further analysis we realized the number of existing trails could be over 800,” John Scott, Chairman of the Sierra Club Calusa Group told DeSmog.

Damage caused by building existing paths was done and paid for decades ago, the letters states, and asking taxpayers to pay the bill for this $140 million project plus maintenance at a rate of $7,500 per mile per year, doesn’t make sense. 

The letter concludes, “This project is an unnecessary use of public funds while community benefits are minimal and dubious in value.”

Among other problems the new path will create, the letter argues that the new path will make conditions for those who useU.S. Route 41 more dangerous. The bike path would eliminate existing shoulder space where locals traditionally stop and fish. 

The River of Grass Draft Feasibility Study and Master Plan, released in May by the National Park Service, prepared by AECOMTechnical Services, identifies more than 20 wildlife species that could be affected by the ROGG, including the endangered Florida panther.

According to the Miami-Dade County Parks Department, the final feasibility study, paid for with a $1 million federal grant, will be released by January 2016.

As a decision on the project looms seven years after it was initiated, the ROGG is losing support.

The Naples Pathway Coalition, a nonprofit that advocates for safe roads for bicyclists and pedestrians that originally proposed the project in 2006, withdrew its support. Though the group has not condemned the ROGG, Beth Brainard, the coalition's executive director, told  Broward Palm Beach New Times, that the organization feels its resources are better spent working on other projects. 

The Miami Dade Government has a page on its website about the plans for the ROGG that is arguably an endorsement – it doesn’t mention any potential negative outcomes.

DeSmog asked whether the Miami-Dade County Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces Dept. supported the bike path.  Mark A. Heinicke, senior park planner and project manager for the ROGG, didn’t answer the question. Instead, Heinicke referred DeSmog to an advocacy group called Friends of the River of Grass Greenway (FROGG) to get more information, and sent a list of “quick facts” about the project that states: “No decision has been made to move forward on this project at this time.”

Maria I. Nardi, chief of Planning and Design Excellence with the parks department would not indicate one way or the other where the department stands. She wrote in an email: “The Parks Department is simply facilitating the Feasibility Study, various path options have been presented, and Federal agencies are responsible for making a final decision on the project.“

Osceola sees the Parks Department’s lack of commitment as a sign the tide is turning against the project.

However, even without the path, the Everglades is still under constant threat. “Today’s Everglades cannot sustain human life in the way it did for our ancestors,” Osceola said. “Now to exist here, you have to bring in food and water. People have been advised not to eat more than one meal of fish caught in the Everglades a week due to the high level of phosphate and mercury pollution.”

Another threat is the expansion of drilling in the Everglades. Oil extraction is already taking place at the Raccoon Point oil fields, inside the Big Cypress National Preserve. 

When learning about the project proposal, the word “collocate” made Osceola and others question if the bike path isn’t just a way to get taxpayers to cover needed infrastructure to expand oil and gas operations. 

The Parks Department did not comment on what potential elements could be collocated with the ROGG. However, the department has previously claimed: “No part of this study is intended to promote development nor does it in any way analyze or allow for oil or gas exploration.”

But opponents of the project believe companies could stand to benefit by gaining access to the environmentally sensitive areas. Osceola and Scott wouldn’t be surprised at all if Raccoon Point is able to benefit from the building of the ROGG in some way.

Currently under consideration is a proposal by Burnett Oil Company to seismically test 70,454 acres in the Big Cypress National Preserve. Seismic testing is done to determine if recoverable oil exists. 

And last year the Dan A. Hughes Company was caught fracking without permission in Naples. The public outcry against the frack job resulted in a local ban against fracking in Bonita Springs, and a bill co-sponsored by Democratic State Senators Dwight Bullard and Darren Soto to ban fracking statewide. But fracking and other forms of well stimulation in the Everglades remains a possibility. 

VIDEO: Senator Dwight Bullard on Fracking Ban in Florida 

At a public meeting in Naples ahead of the 2016 legislative session, the public had a chance to comment on new bills dealing with the fracking industry. Republican Congressman Curt Clawson took the floor and thanked those at the meeting for the service they were providing to the state. 

He reluctantly talked with DeSmog after he stepped out of the meeting. “I am not a big fan of drilling in the Gulf and we are on the record with that,” Clawson said. “With respect to the Everglades, number one, we respect private property rights. That is important in our economy and our society. Number two, we are respectful of the state’s regulatory authority. And number three, I’m not a big fan of drilling in the Everglades.”

After making that statement, Clawson demanded a promise that his statement on private property rights be published with his statement about drilling. After no such promise was given, Clawson expressed regret for having spoken on the record, and was visibly shaken by the idea that his statement about not being a big fan of drilling in the Everglades would be published without his statement on having respect for private property. 

Though the oil and gas industry plays a small role in Florida’s economy, speaking out against the oil industry seems to be political taboo for many state politicians, including Clawson.

During a visit to the Everglades on Earth Day, President Obama used the opportunity to take a jab at Florida’s Republican Governor Rick Scott, who prohibited state employees from using the term “climate change.” 

“Climate change is threatening this treasure and the communities that depend on it, which includes almost all of South Florida,” Obama said. “And if we don’t act, there may not be an Everglades as we know it. Simply refusing to say the words ‘climate change’ doesn’t mean that climate change isn’t happening.”

Opposition to the bike path peaked in March, when indigenous people and their supporters walked the length of the proposed bike path during a protest to raise awareness to the project.

Baby alligator at the Skunk Ape Nature Reserve & Research Center in Ochopee on U.S. Route 41. © 2015 Julie Dermansky 

Nicole Williams on the Turner River, with a kayak provided by Everglades Adventure Tours. © 2015 Julie Dermansky  

“Traditionally the Florida tribes have wanted to be left alone,” Nicole Williams, a craftsperson and teacher of indigenous descent who took part in the walk, told DeSmog. “But in an effort to protect what is left of the Everglades, that has changed.”

“The Internet has been an important tool for indigenous people across the continent to mobilize against further destruction of the Earth in the fight to stop tar sands use,” she said. “People coming together to fight for the planet is our only hope of saving what is left.” 

Yet supporters of the ROGG like Maureen Bonness, a co-founder of FROGG, an advocacy group established to support the project, believes the protest is being led by a “not-in-my-backyard” group of recreational hunters and others who just want the Everglades to themselves, according to the Naples Daily News. 

The only claim her organization makes about the project, which those who oppose it don’t dispute, is that it could bring hundreds of thousands more visitors to the Everglades.

“How much population can the Everglades sustain and still keep its wildness?” Oscaola asks. “If you keep taking away from the areas that animals have to live – where are they going to go?” she pondered from atop of her airboat in the heart of the Everglades. “This land can only sustain so much life.” 

The Everglades. © 2015 Julie Dermansky  

VACCINES AND VETERANS — MANDATES AND PENDING LEGISLATION

IMAGE SOURCE: darkgovernment.com

FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER:

“To veterans from NVIC Advocacy — If you are a veteran or have friends or loved ones who are veterans, there is currently a bill moving through the US Senate concerning veterans and vaccines. NVIC Advocacy is tracking this bill on the portal at www.nvicadvocacy.org

S.1203 is sponsored by Senator Dean Heller, Republican from Nevada.

https://www.congress.gov/member/dean-heller/H001041

This bill is long and has several proposals in it. One Section of this bill would require the VA to ensure that veterans receiving medical services from the VA receive each immunization on the recommended adult immunization schedule at the time such immunization is indicated on that schedule.

While the VA should make all vaccines available to veterans, veterans should not be forced or coerced to get every vaccine on the adult schedule in order to meet quality measures or metrics, which this bill proposes. If passed this has the potential to force veterans into getting a vaccine they may not want in order to receive medical services.

This bill was heard by the Senate Veterans’ and Affairs committee and is currently on the Senate Calendar under general orders.

ACTION NEEDED: 1) Contact Senator Heller and ask him to remove the section of S.1203 that requires the VA “ensure” veterans receiving medical services from the VA receive each vaccine on the adult schedule. These vaccines should be available on a voluntary basis and not coerced or forced in any way to meet quality measures or metrics. Senator Dean Heller 324 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: 202–224–6244 Fax: 202–228–6753 Senator Heller’s website:

http://www.heller.senate.gov/public/

1. Contact your own US Senators and ask them to oppose S.1203 unless it is amended to remove the section that requires the VA “ensure” veterans receiving medical services from the VA receive each vaccine on the adult schedule.

http://www.senate.gov/senators/contact/

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/s1203

According to the Veterans Affairs Committee Report — https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/114th-congress/senate-report/153/1?

q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22actionCommitteeCode%3Assva00%7C13200%22%5D%7D:

Section 101 of this bill would require the VA to report to Congress each year on programs conducted during the previous fiscal year to ensure that veterans have received each immunization on the recommended adult immunization schedule at the time such immunization is indicated on that schedule.

The bill would also require VA to submit to Congress, within 2 years of enactment, a report on the development and implementation of quality measures and metrics to ensure that veterans receiving medical services from VA receive each immunization on the recommended adult immunization schedule at the time such immunization is indicated on that schedule.

Text from the bill — https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/s1203/text

SEC. 101. Improved access to appropriate immunizations for veterans. (a) Inclusion of recommended adult immunizations as medical services. — (1) COVERED BENEFIT. — Subparagraph (F) of section 1701(9) of title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: “(F) immunizations against infectious diseases, including each immunization on the recommended adult immunization schedule at the time such immunization is indicated on that schedule;”. (2) RECOMMENDED ADULT IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE DEFINED. — Section 1701 of such title is amended by adding after paragraph (9) the following new paragraph: “(10) The term ‘recommended adult immunization schedule’ means the schedule established (and periodically reviewed and, as appropriate, revised) by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices established by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and delegated to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.”. (b) Inclusion of recommended adult immunizations in annual report. — Section 1704(1)(A) of such title is amended — (1) in clause (i), by striking “and” at the end; (2) in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting “; and”; and (3) by inserting after clause (ii) the following new clause: “(iii) to provide veterans each immunization on the recommended adult immunization schedule at the time such immunization is indicated on that schedule.”. (c) Report to Congress. — (1) IN GENERAL. — Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the development and implementation by the Department of Veterans Affairs of quality measures and metrics, including targets for compliance, to ensure that veterans receiving medical services under chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, receive each immunization on the recommended adult immunization schedule at the time such immunization is indicated on that schedule. (2) RECOMMENDED ADULT IMMUNIZATION SCHEDULE DEFINED. — In this subsection, the term “recommended adult immunization schedule” has the meaning given that term in section 1701(10) of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(2).

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE-2010-title38/USCODE-2010-title38-partII-chap17-subchapII-sec1718

- current law to be amended

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/adult.html — adult ACIP Vaccine Schedule.”

Read more here:

https://www.facebook.com/national.vaccine.information.center/posts/10153582115602931

Someone had originally posted the following on my page and I have been looking over the bill and the CDC adult vaccination schedule, and it all is positively frightening. This is going to end up being a very important issue for Veterans that have already been screwed over by mandatory vaccinations and the resulting health issues that the VA tries not to cover or pay for…

Original post on my Facebook page:

US Senate bill: S1203 Here is where all military veterans will be subjected to ALL vaccines for the FULL schedule for the rest of their lives including an annual flu shot OR lose their medical. What a wonderful way to award the people who put their lives on the line to defend our freedom! Looks like they lose their “freedom” to choose what vaccines they want — if any. But it sure is a wonderful gift to the pharmaceutical companies — a reward for their “service” in campaign donations. Lock in students, nurses, teachers and military — who’s next for forced vaccinations?

(I wrote this last part to my friend under the post) ***Remember, active duty military are already LOCKED IN, they get an unknown schedule of vaccinations while in basic training and throughout their military service. They cannot opt out. This could include experimental vaccines or vaccines that have not been tested. Veterans however are currently not required to take vaccines, we can still refuse/opt-out at VA facilities. Medically licensed people here in Florida for example can opt out of everything except the TB test. But if this bill becomes law, for Veterans it will change. This is MEDICAL TYRANNY!

Veterans of course want the right to choose and the right to informed consent, not forced mandates. Forced mandates are nothing more than medical tyranny. We veterans were on the front lines to assure that tyranny of all kinds does not happen in this country. We took an oath to defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I hope veterans remember that vow. It does apply to corporate rule as our government is now owned, has been usurped by the corporations. Vaccines in most cases do not cure or protect us, but make could make some of us sicker and definitely create a huge and continuing revenue stream for Big Pharma.

In many cases the military has already poisoned we veterans with exposures that we did not know about or consent to and as I mentioned above, vaccines that were experimental, or not tested or not tested adequately. We were also in close proximity to weapons and chemicals that were toxic and poison and sometimes without any protective or HAZMAT gear. Many of the conditions we veterans now have were due to those exposures during our military service (the VA website confirms a lot of this, including Diabetes 2, Agent Orange exposure, Leukemia exposures to chemicals, Gulf War Syndrome and so many more).

What is important to note is the current CDC adult schedule that would be required by this legislation would mean over 90 vaccinations for each veteran. Many people wonder if the mandating of vaccines COULD BE a eugenics program. And the most important question, at what cost, who will inevitably pay and who benefits?

The powers that be already don’t want to pay for sick veterans and they have made that abundantly clear in what they say, how they legislate and their continued stripping of our rights to adequate health care and benefits. There seems to be few problems and plenty of money to CREATE sick veterans in corporate wars and conflicts in 140+ countries around the world.

There are many more vaccination mandate bills being floated around, here is a comprehensive list and more information:

http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/110-bills-currently-being-proposed-in-36-states-to-enact-medical-tyranny-regarding-vaccines/

This has everything to do with creating a corporate/revenue stream, to absolve the government from paying out and to reward Big Pharma. Veterans entered into the military thinking that they were upholding our FREEDOMS, not bowing to Tyranny!

I am not an “anti-vaxxer” and do not bow to that inaccurate term that the Medical Industrial Complex and Big Pharma uses. I am a concerned citizen, a veteran, a widow of a military member and I come from a military family. I am for informed consent and I am pro-choice regarding what happens to my body (same as with my legal right to an abortion as a woman). I earned that right. I gave up 4 years of my life to have that right. I am attempting to assure that others have that right.

Anita Stewart

Member of Veterans for Peace

USAF, Strategic Air Command

1981–85.

STORY ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED HERE:

https://medium.com/@AnitaStewart/vaccines-and-veterans-mandates-and-pending-legislation-9da6312a80b0

#VACCINES & #VETERANS on BlogTalkRadio: http://tobtr.com/s/8054207 

Guest & veteran @AnitaStewart on the #radio show speaking about #Senate #Bill #S1203

Sallie Elkordy’s show where we talked about this topic earlier this week.